Apple Hints at Generating Revenue from Third-Party AI Apps

Apple's services business is living through a contradictory moment: record revenue figures on one hand, and mounting regulatory and legal pressure on the other. On its latest earnings call with analysts, the company left the door open to multiple interpretations when it suggested that artificial intelligence could become a new source of growth — not only through its own products and services, but also through «third-party apps and partnerships». The phrase is brief, but it's enough to raise big questions about how Apple intends to price the AI wave within its ecosystem.

What exactly did Apple say?

Kevan Parekh, the company's Chief Financial Officer, linked artificial intelligence to long-term revenue growth from two angles. The first relates to hardware: having cutting-edge AI capabilities gives users a compelling reason to upgrade or to switch over from competing platforms. The second is far more ambiguous — the existence of «opportunities» through third-party apps and partnerships, alongside the internal opportunities Apple is building itself.

Parekh did not clarify the nature of these opportunities or the revenue model attached to them, which has prompted investors and analysts to float hypotheses. The most prominent theory, as circulated in press reports, holds that Apple may take on the distribution of AI agents built by outside developers through the App Store, in exchange for a share of the revenue those agents generate. It's a familiar logic for the company, but it becomes far more complex when the paid service is a subscription to a language model or an agent running in the cloud.

Why is Apple looking for new revenue sources?

The motive becomes clear when you look at what's happening in the App Store. Although the services segment continues to grow overall, commission revenue has taken a series of hits:

• Court-imposed restrictions: The landmark lawsuit brought by Epic Games ended with Apple being required to let apps direct users to external payment systems, shrinking its cut of transactions.
• Local regulations: Markets such as Brazil and Japan have introduced new rules that have affected the commission model, while outside estimates in August pointed to a drop of roughly 18% in commission revenue within the United States.
• Slowing mobile games: Historically the single largest driver of App Store sales, and the company still expects pressure on this segment to continue in the coming quarters.

On the other side of the ledger, Apple posted a record number of paid subscriptions, with double-digit growth in third-party app subscriptions — meaning subscriptions are attempting to offset what traditional commissions are losing. The company expects services growth of between 8% and 9% in the quarter ending in December, factoring in headwinds related to third-party technology licensing and currency fluctuations.

Possible scenarios

There are no official details, but the nature of Apple's business makes three directions the most plausible:

• A share of AI subscriptions: Collecting a percentage of subscriptions for apps built on generative models, provided they go through the in-app payment system.
• Distribution partnerships: Agreements with major model providers to integrate their capabilities into the system experience, similar to the search engine deals that generate billions for Apple each year.
• An intermediary layer for agents: Apple becoming the gateway that connects intelligent agents to a user's apps and data, and charging for that governed access.

Practical implications for developers and businesses

For developers, the key message is that the cost of distribution on Apple's platforms may be redefined in the age of artificial intelligence — particularly since running models consumes expensive cloud resources, and any additional cut taken out of a subscription directly affects profit margins. That makes financial planning for AI-powered apps far more sensitive: tiered pricing, reducing reliance on cloud inference where possible, and building subscription channels outside the store wherever the law permits.

At the enterprise level, what's happening here reflects a deeper shift: the major platforms no longer view artificial intelligence as a technical feature bolted onto a product, but as an economic layer in its own right from which value can be extracted. Anyone building intelligent solutions today needs to account for the fact that distribution and payment rules will change yet again, and that architectural and commercial flexibility will be a competitive advantage rather than a luxury.

So far, Apple has offered no further clarification on what it means by «opportunities through third-party apps» — an ambiguity that may well be deliberate at a stage when regulatory cases remain open in more than one market.

✦ بقلم فريق دروب أيديا